Europe Court rules Super League - La Liga
(COMBO) This combination of file pictures made on 19 April, 2021, shows the logos of the following European football clubs: (top, L-R) Liverpool on 30 May, 2019 in Madrid; Manchester United on 5 July, 2013 in Manchester; Arsenal on 2 March, 2019 in London; Chelsea on 13 March, 2020 in London; a football ball on 17 September, 2018 in Istanbul (bottom, L-R) Manchester City on 10 April, 2021 in Manchester; Tottenham Hotspur on 2 March, 2019 in London; Atletico Madrid on 20 May, 2014 in Lisbon; AC Milan on 10 September, 2006 in Milan and Inter Milan on 7 April, 2021 in Milan. – Photo:AFP

Home » European Court of Justice to decide fate of Super League

European Court of Justice to decide fate of Super League

The European Court of Justice is poised to deliver a game-changing ruling on the controversial Super League initiative

21-12-23 14:01
Europe Court rules Super League - La Liga
(COMBO) This combination of file pictures made on 19 April, 2021, shows the logos of the following European football clubs: (top, L-R) Liverpool on 30 May, 2019 in Madrid; Manchester United on 5 July, 2013 in Manchester; Arsenal on 2 March, 2019 in London; Chelsea on 13 March, 2020 in London; a football ball on 17 September, 2018 in Istanbul (bottom, L-R) Manchester City on 10 April, 2021 in Manchester; Tottenham Hotspur on 2 March, 2019 in London; Atletico Madrid on 20 May, 2014 in Lisbon; AC Milan on 10 September, 2006 in Milan and Inter Milan on 7 April, 2021 in Milan. – Photo:AFP

The latest bid to set up a Super League of the biggest European football clubs collapsed swiftly under the weight of fan anger, but the idea did not die.

Now Europe’s top court is to make a ruling in a case that could change the game forever.

The European Court of Justice will deliver a ruling on the breakaway Super League on Thursday that could be a key victory for European football’s governing body UEFA or send shockwaves through the sport.

ALSO READ: Africa Super League kick-off with major changes

SUPER LEAGUE

The case goes back to April 2021, when 12 of Europe’s biggest clubs announced they had signed up to the planned Super League, just before UEFA was to reveal reforms to the Champions League.

The Super League was seen as a direct competitor to UEFA’s flagship competition.

ALSO READ: Court declares UEFA violated EU law in blocking Super League

The upstart league quickly fell apart in the face of a strong backlash from supporters, both UEFA and the world governing body FIFA threatened to take disciplinary action against the clubs involved.

English fans in particular remained loyal to their traditional domestic league model and nine of the 12 rebel clubs — including six from the English Premier League — threw in the towel within 48 hours.

Two years on, only Spanish giants Real Madrid and Barcelona have stood by the dormant project, with Italian giant Juventus withdrawing in July.

Juve president Andrea Agnelli had been a key pro-Super League voice but he resigned late last year and was then barred from Italian football for two years after his club broke financial rules.

Yet the threat of a breakaway by Europe’s most powerful clubs to form a lucrative US-style closed league, with no promotion or relegation, still hangs over football.

ALSO READ: CAF boss: How Chiefs & Pirates didn’t qualify for Super League

PROPORTIONATE PUNISHMENTS?

In October last year the promoters of the Super League launched A22 Sports Management, a company whose aim is to contest UEFA’s so-called “monopoly” over the sport on the continent.

Whether or not they will make a comeback may depend on Thursday’s judgement, when the court will rule on several questions put to it in 2021 by a judge in Madrid.

But most crucially it will decide whether UEFA is “abusing its dominant position” in submitting all tournaments in Europe to its authority, and threatening punishments against clubs and players.

ALSO READ: CAF Africa Super League to launch changes, different from original

UEFA has cause for optimism, given that ECJ Advocate General Athanasios Rantos advised a year ago that rules laid out by European football’s governing body, as well as by FIFA, were “compatible” with European Union competition law.

Yet, while the court’s top legal advisor’s opinion is respected, it is not binding.

JUDGEMENT

The details of the judge’s decision could have a major impact on club football, and more broadly for the regulation of sporting competitions in Europe.

The court will decide whether measures taken against the rebels by UEFA have “legitimate objectives” in mind and are “proportionate”.

The first question seems clear cut, given that European treaties explicitly protect the “sporting model” on the continent, with a system of promotion and relegation and a redistribution of revenues.

But it remains to be seen what are considered “proportionate” reprisals from UEFA to protect its model.

Should these be limited financial sanctions against clubs?

ALSO READ: CAF Africa Super League faces delays and format changes

Or could players and clubs who take part in a rival competitions be banned from international tournaments such as the World Cup and the Champions League, as FIFA and UEFA envisaged in April 2021?

© Agence France-Presse